🔗 Share this article

As any major prize-giving event nears, there’s always a clamor for introducing of new categories to honor overlooked contributions and delight the passions of followers dedicated to specific genres.

Another commentator previously argued supporting a scary games classification. That would be fantastic. Equally deserving are board games, this being a dedicated supporter's campaign. But they will have to forgive me for pushing forward because like all dedicated enthusiasts, there's a strong justification backing this proposal stands as crucial above others. This is the request: We need a category for puzzle games.

Categorizing Game Types

Organizing artistic expressions defies precise measurement; opinions vary greatly, and inevitably start arguments concluding with vague boundaries. There’s a reason film award organizations don’t do it. However, it represents a necessary evil for the industry of interactive entertainment, which are so diverse they barely qualify a single creative category.

For the full spectrum of interactive entertainment excellence to receive acknowledgment, and for games of all stripes to compete fairly, classification by type becomes crucial.

Present Award Structure

Prominent interactive entertainment events presently include classifications covering Action-oriented games, Action/Adventure, Role-Playing, Fighting, Simulation and strategy titles, and Sports/Racing games. Between them, these classifications effectively encompass a lot of ground, making space possible for most games within them.

Not so for brain-teasing titles. No suitable classification appears to accommodate them. Consider three of this year’s best games, each quite distinct: the architectural riddles from a specific release, intense tile-matching from another release, thought-provoking social scenarios from additional release. What category would fit them among existing types? Nowhere, that’s where.

The Representation Problem

There are dozens excellent brain-teasers published annually without proper recognition in entertainment awards, except when they manage to fit classification types such as Handheld titles, VR/AR Game, and the highly challenging small studio competitions.

• A renowned logic title wasn’t nominated in any category that year
• Another creative title was excluded that year
• Popular arranging title received no acknowledgment that year
• Only a few brain-teasers scraped into independent or mobile categories

Value of Brain-Teasers

These are often compact experiences, however the design behind logic titles is of massive significance. Well-known matching games count as most popular titles in the world continuing this trend for many years.

The legendary block-stacking game rivals famous sandbox experiences claiming status as highest-selling title ever; it also contends for best game of all time. Logic titles represent cornerstones to the art of video games, and they are in conversation with almost every other genre.

Proposal and Rationale

Brain-teasers wouldn't encounter such difficulty. One could readily select multiple candidates interesting, varied, worthy titles annually without trouble — or rather, with difficulty, since numerous excellent so many good games out.

And to reiterate, these include experiences without proper classification during prominent ceremonies. Brain-teaser creators operate at the hard edge game development, creating some of essential manifestations within interactive entertainment. Just like film action specialists, they deserve recognition. We shouldn't delay generations.